In this article I will share the best Vanta alternatives for SOC 2 compliance, to help businesses find the right platform for their security and compliance needs. We’ll examine the best alternatives, such as Drata, Secureframe
Thoropass, Sprinto, and more, comparing their features, pros and cons, and benefits to help you choose the best solution for your organization’s SOC 2 compliance journey.
Key Points & Best Vanta Alternatives for SOC 2 Compliance
| Alternative | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Drata | Automates compliance monitoring, evidence collection, and control management for efficient SOC 2 readiness. |
| Secureframe | Simplifies SOC 2 compliance through guided onboarding, automated evidence collection, and expert support. |
| Thoropass | Combines compliance automation with audit services, streamlining SOC 2 certification and audit preparation. |
| Sprinto | Accelerates SOC 2 readiness through continuous monitoring, automated workflows, and guided remediation processes. |
| Scytale | Provides automated compliance workflows and dedicated expert guidance to simplify SOC 2 certification. |
| Scrut Automation | Centralizes compliance, risk management, and evidence automation across multiple security frameworks, including SOC 2. |
| Strac Comply | Combines AI-powered compliance automation with data security capabilities to simplify SOC 2 readiness. |
| LowerPlane | Helps teams organize compliance activities, manage security controls, and streamline audit preparation processes. |
| AuditBoard | Supports enterprise risk management, internal controls, and audit workflows for structured compliance oversight. |
| Process Street | Organizes recurring compliance tasks, control reviews, approvals, and documentation through automated workflows. |
10 Best Vanta Alternatives for SOC 2 Compliance
1. Drata
For organizations that want automated security compliance and continuous control monitoring, Drata is a powerful alternative to Vanta. It prepares businesses for SOC 2 audits by assisting them to organize compliance requirements, gather evidence from integrated systems, monitor security controls and track remediation activities.
It can help teams stay on top of compliance gaps rather than relying on manual spreadsheets and periodic reviews. For tech companies with existing engineering and security teams that need to keep on top of recurring compliance tasks as they grow, Drata could be a good option.
Before deciding on Drata, evaluate its integration with your existing infrastructure, compatibility with other required frameworks, the level of implementation effort, and the overall subscription fees.
Drata Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Automates evidence collection and continuous control monitoring. | Setup and configuration may require significant internal coordination. |
| Supports compliance across multiple security frameworks. | Pricing is generally quote-based, making initial budget comparisons difficult. |
| Helps teams identify control gaps and track remediation. | Teams still need to investigate and resolve security issues. |
| Useful for growing technology companies with established security processes. | Some workflows may require training and ongoing administration. |
2. Secureframe
Secureframe is a compliance automation platform that helps businesses build, operate, and maintain security compliance programs. Vanta alternative with structured workflows for SOC 2 audit preparation, policy management, evidence collection, control requirement tracking, and compliance gap remediation.
Startups and growing companies without a large internal compliance department, or those going through their first security attestation, may find its guided approach helpful. Secureframe also supports multiple compliance frameworks, which can help organizations coordinate requirements as their responsibilities grow.
If you’re a company looking to compare the platform to Vanta, you’ll want to look at the integrations available, the onboarding support, the frameworks it covers, how it handles auditors and the pricing to see if it will work for your operations.
Secureframe Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Provides structured compliance workflows and evidence collection. | The level of guidance and functionality can vary by plan. |
| Offers support for multiple compliance frameworks. | Some advanced capabilities may increase the overall cost. |
| Provides access to compliance expertise and audit partner options. | Implementation still requires employee participation and control remediation. |
| Helps organize policies, tasks, and audit preparation. | Teams should verify integration coverage for their specific technology stack. |
3. Thoropass
Thoropass is a good choice for companies that want compliance software and audit-related services coordinated through a single vendor. It leverages tools to organize compliance requirements, collect evidence of support, track readiness, and manage the audit process.
This can alleviate the administrative burden of managing separate software vendors, consultants and auditors. Thoropass can appeal to startups and growing companies that need expert guidance along their SOC 2 journey, especially when internal teams have limited experience with audit preparation.
Organizations should verify what services are included in the package they choose, whether the audit arrangement meets their needs, and how much flexibility they will have in choosing an auditor.
Thoropass Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Combines compliance software with audit services through one provider. | Bundled services may offer less flexibility for some buyers. |
| Helps coordinate readiness activities and audit preparation. | Pricing and service inclusions generally require a customized quote. |
| Provides access to expertise throughout the compliance process. | Organizations should carefully review audit scope and deliverables. |
| Can reduce coordination between separate software and audit providers. | Businesses with an existing auditor should confirm compatibility and arrangements. |
4. Sprinto
Sprinto is a compliance automation platform to help businesses streamline their SOC 2 readiness and ongoing security compliance. It supports workflows for mapping requirements, gathering evidence, monitoring controls, assigning tasks, and identifying issues that require remediation.
Its guided approach might appeal to startups and small and medium-sized businesses, as it offers a structured process without requiring them to build out extensive compliance operations from scratch. Sprinto also supports multiple frameworks so that companies can organize overlapping requirements as their compliance programs mature.
When comparing Sprinto vs Vanta, companies need to evaluate how well it fits into their tech stack, how flexible the workflows are, how much hand-holding is available, and the total cost of staying compliant in the long run.
Sprinto Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Automates evidence workflows and ongoing compliance monitoring. | Integration depth should be checked against your existing systems. |
| Offers guided remediation for identified compliance gaps. | Custom environments may require additional configuration and coordination. |
| Supports multiple compliance frameworks as requirements expand. | Teams must still assign control owners and complete remediation tasks. |
| Well suited to cloud-based businesses pursuing SOC 2 readiness. | Pricing and included support should be confirmed directly with the vendor. |
5. Scytale
Scytale is the SOC 2 compliance platform that automates the process and adds in expert guidance. It helps organizations gather evidence, monitor controls, manage policies, identify compliance gaps, and coordinate audit activities from a single centralized environment.
The platform also provides cross-framework control mapping, vendor risk management, access reviews and a trust center for sharing security information with customers.
Scytale can be especially useful for startups and growing companies seeking experienced guidance along with software automation, rather than trying to handle all compliance tasks on their own.
Before you choose Scytale, consider its integrations, if there is dedicated compliance support, what frameworks are covered, and what your team will need to own throughout the audit process.
Scytale Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Combines compliance automation with hands-on expert guidance. | Pricing transparency may be limited before a sales consultation. |
| Helps manage policies, evidence, and control requirements. | The level of expert assistance may depend on the selected package. |
| Supports organizations managing several compliance frameworks. | Buyers should verify integrations and automation depth for their environment. |
| Can help lean teams navigate unfamiliar audit requirements. | Organizations must still provide accurate evidence and implement required controls. |
6. Scrut Automation
Scrut Automation is a security compliance and governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform for organizations to manage security controls, risks and audit requirements. It’s an alternative to Vanta and can help teams centralize compliance tasks, organize evidence, monitor control status, manage vendor risk and coordinate activities across multiple frameworks.
This broader approach may be more suitable for businesses that wish to link SOC 2 readiness to continuous risk management rather than viewing certification as a one-off project. Scrut is worth considering for expanding companies with more complex compliance obligations.
Before making a final decision, buyers should verify support for their required frameworks, integration compatibility, reporting capabilities, implementation services and pricing.
Scrut Automation Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Combines compliance management with broader risk oversight. | Pricing may require direct consultation and a customized proposal. |
| Helps centralize evidence, controls, and remediation activities. | The breadth of features may require additional onboarding. |
| Supports multiple frameworks and cross-framework control management. | Integration coverage should be verified for essential business systems. |
| Useful for growing organizations with expanding compliance obligations. | Some capabilities may depend on the selected modules or package. |
7. Strac Comply
Strac Comply is a compliance automation platform that integrates SOC 2 readiness workflows with security-focused testing and data protection capabilities. It publishes automated control testing, evidence collection, policy management, vendor risk workflows, access reviews, vulnerability scanning and portals for auditors and customers.
This could appeal to organizations that want to show they have security controls in place and get more visibility into sensitive-data risks. Strac Comply also has published pricing and packages, which differ according to the services they include, which makes it easier for buyers to compare costs.
Businesses should buy in, having checked the latest plan inclusions, independent audit arrangements, integration coverage, employee limits and any extra data-security charges.
Strac Comply Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Combines compliance workflows with data-security capabilities. | Buyers should validate the maturity of individual features against their needs. |
| Supports evidence collection, policy management, and control testing. | Integration coverage may vary across technical environments. |
| Can help connect SOC 2 readiness with sensitive-data protection. | Pricing and package inclusions should be confirmed before purchase. |
| Offers workflows for vendor risk and access reviews. | Teams may still need separate tools for specialized security operations. |
8. LowerPlane
LowerPlane is a compliance automation platform that enables businesses to manage multiple security and privacy frameworks using a single control library. It supports SOC 2, as well as frameworks like ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and PCI DSS.
Features include evidence collection, policy management, compliance assessments, control ownership, risk tracking and cross-framework mapping. This can help organizations reuse evidence and avoid doing the same work twice when getting ready for multiple compliance needs simultaneously.
If you want one compliance workflow and help getting it in place, you might like LowerPlane. Before you adopt it, ensure that it integrates, produces quality automated evidence, provides support, and maps controls to the specific needs of your auditor.
LowerPlane Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Helps centralize compliance activities and control documentation. | Buyers should verify the breadth of available integrations. |
| Supports mapping requirements across multiple frameworks. | Advanced automation may differ from specialist SOC 2 platforms. |
| Can reduce duplicated work across compliance programs. | Implementation may require internal ownership and process configuration. |
| Helps organize evidence, policies, and risk-related activities. | Confirm current product capabilities and support options before purchasing. |
9. AuditBoard
AuditBoard provides an enterprise platform to manage audit, risk, internal controls and governance activities. Where Vanta specializes in security compliance automation, consider AuditBoard if you want wider visibility into enterprise risk management, internal audit and control testing.
It helps teams coordinate assessments, document findings, track remediation and maintain visibility into risk-related activities across departments. Whether it is suitable for SOC 2 will depend on the organization’s existing processes and the specific products chosen
from AuditBoard, and it shouldn’t be automatically assumed to be a direct replacement for every technical evidence-collection feature offered by dedicated compliance tools. Buyers should consider implementation complexity, integration needs, reporting capabilities, and total cost.
AuditBoard Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Provides extensive governance, risk, and audit management capabilities. | May be more complex than necessary for a small startup. |
| Helps coordinate internal controls, assessments, and remediation. | Implementation can require dedicated resources and process alignment. |
| Supports enterprise-wide risk visibility and reporting. | Pricing and implementation costs may be substantial for smaller teams. |
| Useful for organizations with established audit and risk departments. | Not a direct replacement for every technical compliance automation feature. |
10. Process Street
Process Street is a workflow management platform that enables organizations to standardize repetitive tasks, assign responsibilities, record approvals and track completed activities. It can facilitate repeatable processes for SOC 2 programs such as employee onboarding and offboarding, access reviews, policy acknowledgments, vendor assessments, incident response exercises, and periodic control checks.
Its main strength is the organization of the human activities that keep the compliance processes running consistently. Process Street is more about executing workflows, unlike specialist platforms that are dedicated to automated technical evidence gathering and continuous security monitoring.
It may be suitable for teams that need structured procedures, but buyers should confirm if additional tools are necessary for technical evidence and audit preparation.
Process Street Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Standardizes recurring compliance tasks and control procedures. | Does not replace a dedicated SOC 2 evidence automation platform. |
| Supports task assignments, approvals, and documented workflows. | Technical monitoring may require integrations or separate security tools. |
| Helps maintain consistency in employee and vendor procedures. | Compliance processes must be designed and maintained by the organization. |
| Useful for coordinating teams and documenting completed activities. | Buyers should assess audit reporting and evidence export requirements carefully. |
Conclusion
To wrap it all up, picking the Best Vanta Alternatives for SOC 2 Compliance depends on your business needs, budget, and security requirements. There are platforms like Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass and Scytale that offer useful compliance automation and support.
Compare their features, pros and cons, pricing and audit services before making your choice to opt for the best one to streamline your SOC 2 compliance and ensure long-term security readiness.
FAQ
Is Drata a good alternative to Vanta?
Yes, Drata provides automated evidence collection, continuous monitoring, and compliance management features.
Which Vanta alternative is best for startups?
Sprinto and Secureframe offer guided workflows suitable for growing startups pursuing SOC 2.
Which alternative combines SOC 2 software with audit services?
Thoropass combines compliance software with audit services through a coordinated platform.
Is Secureframe suitable for small businesses?
Yes, Secureframe helps small businesses streamline compliance preparation through automation and guidance.
