What Is Finance.Vote (FVT) Coin Review ?
Finance.Vote network leads with a quadratic voting based prediction market system we call “vote markets The system is designed as a crypto economic game that marries governance with the markets. It is designed to aggregate collective intelligence from a distributed group of pseudo-anonymous crypto users who have their finger on the pulse of the crypto market. Quadratic voting is used to generate a consensus in a perceived future market order.
Finance.Vote This is done by presenting each user with a token list that is by default ordered by the market. Users then spend a budget of vote power to create a new order, based on their perception of token quality and future potential market performance.
Finance.Vote The resultant aggregation of user ordered token lists creates a distribution of perceived market order in the form of a consensus list. At this point in the future, users are rewarded with a proportional share of a network generated reward pool depending on the proportionality of their correctness. This simple mechanic becomes exponentially more powerful as new and diverse markets are added and as the power of the rules of the game is transitioned to token holders.
Finance.Vote (FVT) Storage Key Points
|Source Code||Click Here To View Source Code|
|Explorers||Click Here To View Explorers|
|Twitter Page||Click Here To Visit Twitter Group|
|Whitepaper||Click Here To View|
|Official Project Website||Click Here To Visit Project Website|
Finance.Vote Crypto is the Wild West. It is the most innovative technological space that has ever existed, but permission lessness comes at a cost. New tokens flood the market by the minute and it is becoming increasingly difficult to separate innovation from low quality products or vapourware Liquidity is king, but price discovery of new assets and NFTs remains a huge problem despite the emergence of automated market makers (AMMs). Power comes in the numbers, but decentralization leads to fragmented governance with power weighted towards very few token holders.
3 Core Design Pillars
Market Discovery and Price Prediction
Finance.Vote Using the finance.vote quadratic voting based, rolling consensus system, users are incentivized to make market predictions in a series of tournaments focused on baskets of assets from across the crypto space. It is designed to facilitate the generation of market alpha and the discovery of up and coming tokens from the most viable projects.
Second Layer Governance
Finance.Vote Using quadratic and snapshot voting, finance.vote introduces a suite of governance tools that can provide a voice to minority token holders on any network. The second layer governance tools create a route from rough consensus and dialogue to high-stakes on-chain governance decisions. miniDAOs, AMA tech, social curation tools, quadratic voting tech, gassless voting
Decentralized Social Trading
Finance.Vote social trading system provides groups of any size with the ability to share market information, pool assets and make collectivized trading decisions. Collaborative trading, liquidity mining games, decentralized copy trading
The finance.vote dApp Suite
Finance.Vote These dApps will be the toolset for the DAOs of the future. They are designed to facilitate social consensus formation across a range of use cases, from price discovery and monetary policy formation to content curation and governance.
These applications will form the foundation of a decentralized decision making and will upgrade the governance capabilities of the whole DeFi space as a whole. Together they form a modular DAO architecture that projects will be able to integrate to their needs and modify in collaboration with the finance.vote token holders.
Finance.Vote vote markets will not stay as merely as a collective intelligence and consensus tool. More effective price discovery will arise from those with skin in the game. For those users who wish to increase their exposure to these market bets, a staking system will be released that will allow users to stake $FVT on the market prediction outcomes. Architecturally, the staking system will be a different layer from the voting system reward pool.