10 Best Alternatives To Popular Prop Firms For Traders

In this article, I am going to talk about the best alternatives to well known prop firms for traders who are looking for flexible funding options, fair rules on evaluations, and growth opportunities over a longer period of time.

Trading with a prop firm is always changing, and several firms are able to provide competitive profit splits, clear and easy to understand conditions, and trader-centric models which makes them great alternatives for new and seasoned traders around the world.

Key Points & Best Alternatives to Popular Prop Firms

Alternative Firm	Key Point / Strength
Apex Trader Funding	One-step evaluation process with fast funding access
Audacity Capital	No evaluation challenge, direct funding for skilled traders
City Traders Imperium	High profit split up to 70% with long-term growth focus
E8 Markets	Large account sizes and fast evaluation completion
Earn2Trade	Educational programs plus funded trading opportunities
Elite Trader Funding	Low-cost evaluations with flexible trading rules
The 5%ers	Quick funding approval for experienced traders
Funded Trading Plus	Multiple account types catering to different strategies
FundedNext	Instant funding options with high payout ratios
Lux Trading Firm	Long-term career path with scaling to institutional levels

10 Best Alternatives To Popular Prop Firms

1. Apex Trader Funding

Being accessible and offering real growth opportunities for dedicated traders, Apex Trader Funding is one of the best alternatives to well-known prop firms.

Unlike most firms that have you tied to complicated, evaluative processes, Apex prioritizes straightforwardness and allows traders to shine without any pointless evaluative roadblocks.

Apex’s unwavering and straightforward rules, profit distribution, and risk management, provide traders the opportunity to build both self confidence and capital.

Apex’s transparency in feedback and dedicated support sets them apart. For traders who value flexibility, Apex provides accountability and feedback to help them on their journey to becoming successful funded traders.

Apex Trader Funding Pros And Cons

Pros

• Evaluation process is simple and straightforward.
• Transparent profit-splitting and rule structures.
• Fairly good for both novice and seasoned traders.
• Support is very responsive and provides feedback.

Cons

• Some firm’s drawdown limits may be stricter.
• Some of the firms have a scaled down version of capital.

2. Audacity Capital

Audacity Capital is a London-based propriety firm and funded forex trading a firm that seeks to support and empower fx traders by giving them access to funded trading accounts.

On an account size profit split tier system, traders can access account sizes from a few dollars up to six figure accounts and on profit splits of usually around 85% depending on the program.

Audacity is often praised by traders for their transparent, flexible risk, and low firm-rule coupled with the low risk limit compared to traditional firms. Their ability challenge is a unique firm structure that allows traders

To graduate from challenge to challenge based on different profit attainment goals. This challenge structure is what makes Audacity focused on scalable and sustained trading.

Audacity Capital Pros And Cons

Pros

• Accounts can be scaled to very large sizes.
• Flexible profit-sharing structures (~85% is a good deal).
• Rules around risk are more flexible.
• Trading conditions are less restrictive.

Cons

• Still more evaluation challenges are needed.
• Support is not always so responsive.

3. City Traders Imperium

City Traders Imperium (CTI) has an established reputation as a proprietary trading firm in Dubai and London, providing traders with unique flexibility in their evaluations as well as opportunities in large-scale capital offerings.

With funding potential in the millions and tailored profit splits (often as high as 90-100%), CTI stands out to both novice and veteran traders. MT5 is one of the primary trading platforms, and services are offered in forex, indices, commodities, and CFDs.

A distinguishing factor is their stability provision through a consistent monthly salary as an alternative to profit share, which is only offered to high-performing traders. Considering the vast array of account sizes, community offerings, and support, they are one of the most flexible proprietary (prop) trading firms.

City Trader’s Imperium Pros And Cons

Pros

• Funding potential is high (in the multi-millions).
• Profitable split is very competitive (90-100%).
• Consistent traders receive a salary.
• Major markets and platforms are supported.

Cons

• More costly challenges ($) to big others.
• Complex conditions for some programs.

4. E8 Markets

E8 Markets stands out from other prop firms because of its focus on trader flexibility and transparency over rigid evaluation systems. Unlike other firms, E8 offers its traders the ability to select the account type, risk parameters, and profit goals that best align with their individual trading strategies.

As such, disciplined traders can concentrate on the core aspects of their role uninterrupted. When coupled with clear real-time performance tracking, competitive profit split offerings, and tandem funding growth, E8 Markets appeals to traders of all experience levels.

E8 Markets Pros And Cons

Pros

• Different account types.
• More flexible risk limits.
• Highly configurable trading strategies.
• Profitable profit-sharing.
• Trade analytics are easy to understand and the dashboard is clear.

Cons

• With a reputation that is still developing, companies can be like E8 and alter conditions frequently.

5. Earn2Trade

Earn2Trade clearly stands out among popular prop firms because it combines funded opportunities with a strong focus on trader education and development.

Rather than solely testing for profits, Earn2Trade helps build disciplined and educated traders by incorporating feedback on learning, risk management, and performance into its programs.

This helps traders understand and develop their strategies and market behavior, contributing to consistent success. Because of their strong support resources, clear growth paths, and focus on skill development, they stand apart from firm resources which focus only on evaluating trader results.

Earn to Trade Pros And Cons

Pros

• There is a focus on trader education, along with risk management.
• There is structured learning, as well as a funding pathway.
• There is a defined pathway to progression.
• This is good for the acquisition of foundational skills.

Cons

• The profit splits are generally lower (about 80%).
• Some have longer evaluation periods.

6. Elite Trader Funding

Elite Trader Funding has some appealing qualities compared to most popular prop firms because they combine flexibility with choice, allowing traders different routes to funding rather than being stuck on one evaluation track.

What makes them different is their emphasis on flexibility, as traders can choose either rapid funding accounts, or go the traditional assessment route, based on their confidence and experience.

This means that both developing and experienced traders can find an entry point that best suits their trading style. The firm also has supportive community engagement to help traders stay motivated. For traders seeking flexible funding routes that are straightforward, Elite Trader Funding is a clear choice.

Elite Trader Funding Pros And Cons

Pros

• There are numerous, flexible options for entry.
• There is a good community to foster support.
• There are multiple pathways to a funded account.
• This is good for the support of multiple trader levels.

Cons

• Payouts can be of different timing.
• The fee structure can be confusing.

7. The 5%ers

The 5%ers appreciate sustainable trader success with funding that scales over time instead of funding based on short-term performances. Most prop firms have unstructured growth models which means that they offer funding based on riskier performances.

The 5%ers positive funding cycle encourages traders to build sustainable strategies as they get promoted based on them remaining on profitably. The unmatched guidance and support of the 5%ers provide traders to focus on growth and the sustainability of their strategies. Because The 5%ers support over time positive funding cycles based on performance traders to value sustained growth.

The 5%ers Pros And Cons

Pros

• There are a variety of programs, so funding is more scalable.
• There is an emphasis on disciplined and consistent trading.
• There are generous drawdown limits.
• There is no shortage of programs.

Cons

• The scaling milestones can be difficult.
• There are account types that can have difficult, strict rules.

8. Funded Trading Plus

Funded Trading Plus stands apart from mainstream prop firms due to its speedy payouts and transparent evaluations that reflect actual trading scenarios. What sets them apart the most is how fast traders can receive their profits.

Frequent payout windows is an option that most firms do not provide. This adds to a trader’s motivation to maintain consistent performances without the burden of lengthy payout cycles. Funded Trading Plus also achieves a commendable balance between flexibility and discipline.

They allow traders to adjust their managed risk to their personal liking while still professionally adhering to a set framework. For traders who appreciate rapid access to profits and transparent evaluations, Funded Trading Plus is a superb option.

Funded Trading Plus Pros And Cons

Pros

• There is a diversity of supported markets.
• The evaluations are clear and straightforward.
• The risk controls are balanced.
• There are fast intervals for payouts.

Cons

• They are less known than the larger firms.
• The account sizes can be limited at times.

9. FundedNext

FundedNext has carved a niche for itself for its support of varied evaluations and funding models tailored to traders’ individualized goals and risk tolerances.

An evaluation model differs from others in that it offers a blend of funding options— one-step, two-step, and instant funding— to assess a trader’s confidence and strategic alignment.

With these flexibility models, barriers associated with professional evaluations are lessened, while keeping the standards intact. Along with prompt payout systems and profit sharing

FundedNext caters to both aggressive and conservative trading styles. For having flexible, professional funding options, FundedNext positions itself as the leading evaluation model trader.

FundedNext Pros And Cons

Pros

• The profit splits are competitive.
• There are numerous options for different trader styles.
• There are multiple evaluations available (1 step, 2 step, and instant).
• Payouts are processed quickly.

Cons

• There can be a lot of differences in the terms provided with differing plans.
• The rules are newer, as this is a newer company.

10. Lux Trading Firm

Lux Trading Firm stands out from other prop firms because of its focus on fully explained capital deployment and career ladder prospects rather than short, high pressure challenge cycles.

Most other firms use demo accounts and deploy capital only after funded traders have been evaluated. Lux fully funds traders after the evaluation steps, presenting profit opportunities after aligning their goals with market conditions.

It offers flexibility across its entire account range, allowing traders to scale up from $10 million to smaller accounts, fostering the right kind of growth by incentivizing consistent, long-term positive behavior rather than the quick-win mentality.

Traders who prioritize disciplined growth and capital had time to evaluate, accompanied by no market and platform restrictions, often gravitate towards Lux.

Lux Trading Firm Pros And Cons

Pros

• True capital allocation (not mock)
• Extremely large scaling opportunities (up to ~$10M)
• No hard time restrictions on evaluations
• Access to big market & venues

Cons

• Evaluations can be tedious
• Smaller beginner accounts are not prioritized

Conclusion

To summarize, the leading substitutes to well known proprietary trading companies offer traders flexible evaluation frameworks, competitive profit division, and unambiguous growth trajectories.

These companies maintain focus on consistency, transparency, and the success of the trader, as opposed to more inflexible structures. Selecting an appropriate alternative is dependent on individual trading patterns, the appetite for risk, and the funding objectives over the longer term.

FAQ