This article will center around Non-Custodial Staking Platforms which let users stake their crypto assets and retain full ownership. These platforms provide crypto holders with methods to earn rewards at varying levels of decentralization without needing to trust a third party
Which is the opposite of traditional custodial services. Unlike custodial staking services, these platforms are perfect for novice and professional crypto investors looking for security and liquidity.
Key Points & Top Non-Custodial Staking Platforms List
| Staking Platform | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Lido Finance | Leading liquid staking platform; supports ETH, SOL, and other assets; instant liquidity via stTokens. |
| Rocket Pool | Decentralized ETH staking; allows users to run nodes or stake via rETH; community-governed. |
| Ankr | Multi-chain staking; easy onboarding for beginners; offers DeFi integration and node hosting. |
| StakeWise | ETH2 staking with auto-compounding rewards; low fees; provides staked ETH tokens (sETH2). |
| SSV.Network | Decentralized staking for Ethereum; splits validator keys for security; non-custodial. |
| P2P.org | Offers staking services for multiple PoS networks; focus on high yields and validator infrastructure. |
| Stader Labs | Multi-chain staking solutions; emphasizes institutional-grade staking products; supports liquid staking. |
| Figment | Professional staking infrastructure; supports multiple chains; provides analytics and delegation services. |
| Chorus One | Enterprise-level staking services; focuses on validator reliability and security; multi-chain support. |
Non-Custodial Staking Platforms
1. Lido Finance
The leading non-custodial platform for liquid staking is Lido Finance which focuses on Ethereum as well as Solana and Polygon. Users stake crypto without a persistent lock and receive stTokens ( stETH for example) which represent the staked crypto and rewards.
Users can borrow with staked crypto via transaction-heavy DeFi protocols which provide liquidity while earning staking rewards. Lido employs a fully decentralized network of diverse professional node operators to guarantee safety and effectiveness. It is appealing to retail and institutional clients who want to stake without the user’s control of validator nodes.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supports multiple networks (ETH, SOL, etc.) | Centralization risk due to few large node operators |
| Provides instant liquidity via stTokens | Platform fees may reduce net rewards slightly |
| User-friendly interface, suitable for beginners | Governance and protocol decisions may affect rewards |
| No need to run a validator node | Reliance on smart contracts introduces some technical risk |
| High reliability and large community support | Staked tokens may face market volatility |
2. Rocket Pool
Rocket Pool is an Ethereum staking network without the center point. It lets stakers engage in ETH staking easily and without custodial. Users may stake ETH directly and receive rETH tokens, or with over 16 ETHs staked, they may operate their nodes instead of the 32 ETHs.
It helps in decentralization. Smart contracts automatically control deposits and manage validator operations. Rocket Pool separates the stakers and the node operators, lowering the risk and control balance.
This enables the users to have the control they want. This platform is perfect for users who want to earn staking rewards without custodial associates and contribute to the security of Ethereum’s network.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Fully decentralized ETH staking | Limited to ETH network primarily |
| Allows staking with as little as 16 ETH by running nodes | May be complex for beginners |
| rETH tokens provide liquidity while staking | Network rewards slightly lower than centralized staking |
| Reduces slashing risk via decentralized validator network | Running a node requires technical knowledge and resources |
| Community-governed platform | Less mainstream adoption than Lido |
3. Ankr
Ankr is a non-custodial staking platform that operates on Ethereum, Polkadot, Solana, and other blockchains. Its interface allows users to stake assets without running a node, as advanced users are able to deploy their own.
Ankr also provides liquid staking, which allows stakers to receive a tokenized representation of their staked assets that can be used in decentralized finance or traded. Its decentralized structure allows users to control their private keys and reduce custodial risk.
Ankr also supports integrations with popular crypto wallets and DeFi protocols to earn passive income, simplifying participation in Proof of Stake blockchain networks for retail and institutional investors.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supports multiple blockchains for staking | Rewards may vary by network and protocol |
| User-friendly interface for beginners | Staking derivative tokens may incur DeFi risks |
| Provides liquid staking tokens usable in DeFi | Less decentralized compared to Rocket Pool |
| Easy node deployment for advanced users | Network performance depends on node operators |
| Institutional-grade infrastructure | Slight fees may apply for withdrawals or services |
4. StakeWise
StakeWise offers Ethereum 2.0 stakers auto-compounding rewards while focusing on non-custodial Ethereum 2.0 staking. They deposit ETH and receive sETH2 (staked ETH), wETH2 (reward tokens), which can provide liquidity and also is usable in De-Fi and tradable.
StakeWise splits the rewards and principal tokens for optimizing yield management. StakeWise uses non-custodial validators which help in the security of the system while avoids custodial risk.
This makes it ideal for users looking to self-custody while maximizing returns. StakeWise has low fees with an intuitive interface that helps even the Ethereum staking novices to participate without locking or centralizing their assets.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Auto-compounding rewards maximize yields | Only supports Ethereum network currently |
| Splits principal and reward tokens for flexibility | Limited DeFi integration outside sETH2/wETH2 |
| Low fees compared to other staking platforms | Slightly complex interface for beginners |
| Non-custodial; users keep control | Smaller network of validators than Lido |
| Transparent operations and analytics | Slashing risk remains minimal but possible |
5. Ssv.network
SSV.Network is a platform for Ethereum staking. It is designed for non-custodial staking with a focus on security through distributed validator technology. It divides validator keys across numerous nodes, giving full control of the keys to the customer, while eliminating both single point of failure and single point of theft.
Stakers can access the network without the need for central custodians, therefore protecting the custody of their ETH. SSV.Network is perfect for self-directed and institutional investors who need advanced Ethereum staking that is fully resilient, decentralized, and scalable.
It allows for decentralized management of the keys for the validators, thereby improving network security and lowering the risk of slashing, which enhances the non-custodial Ethereum staking security and flexibility. It truly stands out among others for its innovative approach.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| High-security non-custodial Ethereum staking | Only focused on Ethereum network |
| Distributed validator technology prevents single-point failures | Requires technical knowledge for optimal setup |
| Minimizes slashing risk via key splitting | Smaller user base than major platforms |
| Ideal for advanced and institutional users | Rewards may be slightly lower due to decentralized setup |
| Enhances network decentralization | Not beginner-friendly |
6. P2P.org
P2P.org supports Ethereum, Polkadot, Solana, and Cosmos through custodial staking solutions to multiple P2S blockchains. Users still control their private keys, and the system blindly controls validators through secure smart contract cover. P2P.org promises smart contract staking to naked users, and they tell users to expect high yields, transparent, professional validator infrastructure.
Users can liquid stake, receiving tokens, through hands-free DeFi liquid staking, and custodial hands-free staking are supported simultaneously both by institutions, and by singular users. Through professional validator managing paired with non custodial stake control, P2P.org delivers seamless, versatile, and high profit staking to wide users.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supports multiple PoS blockchains | Interface may be overwhelming for beginners |
| Non-custodial; users maintain control | Yield depends on validator performance |
| Offers liquid staking for flexibility | Slightly higher fees compared to DIY staking |
| Professional validator infrastructure | Limited educational resources for new users |
| Transparent and secure operations | Less well-known than Lido or Rocket Pool |
7. Stader Labs
Stader Labs describes itself as a non-custodial, multi-chain staking platform specializing in liquid staking of Ethereum, Solana, and more. Users stake their tokens and, in return, receive derivatives, which are tradable and DeFi collateral, thus providing liquidity and earning rewards. Stader’s liquid staking emphasizes decentralized validator management to ensure custody of staked assets during secure, high-yield staking.
It is optimized for self-custodial retail and institutional clients and offers scalable infrastructure with simple UX. Stader Labs solves DeFi Staking by maximizing user rewards and control while providing extensive staked assets for deployment in multi-chain.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Multi-chain support | Mainly targets advanced or institutional users |
| Provides liquid staking derivatives | Rewards vary by network |
| Non-custodial with decentralized validator management | Less mainstream adoption |
| User-friendly interface for staking | Some advanced features require knowledge |
| Scalable infrastructure for retail & institutional users | Slight fees may reduce net returns |
8. Figment
Figment provides professional non-custodial staking and validator services across Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos, and more. Users have independent control of their holdings while gaining access to high-value, reliable validator services.
Figment provides industry-leading validator infrastructure, step-by-step analytics, and full transparency to stakers. Figment supports liquid staking and free delegation, enabling users to earn rewards while staked assets are not permanently locked.
With a focus on built-in non-custodial security and enterprise-grade reliability, Figment attracts retail and institutional participants seeking streamlined operational and slashing risk staking across multiple networks with flexible and reliable solutions
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Professional-grade non-custodial staking | Focused on enterprise-level users |
| Multi-chain support | Less beginner-friendly interface |
| Supports liquid staking and delegation | Fees may be higher than retail-focused platforms |
| Robust validator infrastructure and analytics | Smaller community compared to Lido |
| Transparent and secure operations | Rewards depend on validator uptime |
9. Chorus One
Chorus One is a non-custodial staking platform with enterprise-level security and multi-chain support. Their validators do staking on Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos, and other networks while users retain ownership.
Chorus One operates validator infrastructure to maximize rewards without exposing users to asset risk. The platform focuses on transparency, dependability, and sustainable performance to attract professional and institutional stakers.
Chorus One decentralizes validator operation and applies strong security measures to reduce risk while offering competitive staking yields. Investors can self-custody their crypto, and Chorus One’s staking tools, analytics, and other performance metrics offer ample opportunities to confidently participate.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Enterprise-level security | Interface more suitable for professional users |
| Multi-chain staking support | Not beginner-friendly |
| Non-custodial; users retain full control | Rewards vary by validator and network |
| Reliable and transparent validator operations | Less liquidity for derivative tokens compared to Lido |
| Ideal for institutional and long-term stakers | Smaller user base than major platforms |
Conclsuion
In concsluaion Non custodial staking platforms allows users to obtain rewards whilst keeping full ownership of their crypto assets. Users and even some firms other firms such as Lido, Rocket Pull and Ankr.
These platforms are user friendly and provide flexibility, liquid staking and multi chain support even to the users and firms with a more sophisticated needs.
Even though the level of technical skill and the platforms fees differ, all of them guarantee safe, decentralized and effective methods of network validation regardless of custodial reliance.
FAQ
What is a non-custodial staking platform?
It’s a platform where you stake crypto while keeping full control of your private keys.
How is it different from custodial staking?
Unlike custodial platforms, funds are never held by a third party, reducing counterparty risk.
Which platforms are popular for non-custodial staking?
Lido Finance, Rocket Pool, Ankr, StakeWise, SSV.Network, P2P.org, Stader Labs, Figment, and Chorus One.
Can beginners use these platforms?
Yes, many like Lido and Ankr are user-friendly, though some advanced setups require technical knowledge.
What are liquid staking tokens?
Tokens representing staked assets, allowing users to trade or use them in DeFi while earning rewards.
